Skip to main content

Large Farms Continue to Dominate South Dakota Crop Production

Updated April 11, 2024
Thumbnail

Tong Wang

SDSU Extension Advanced Production Specialist

Written collaboratively by Tong Wang and Oranuch Wongpiyabovorn.

Based on 2022 U.S. Census of Agriculture (USDA, 2022), large-scale farms (2,000 acres or more) operate more than two-thirds of the total cropland acres in South Dakota (abbreviated as SD) (Figure 1). During 1997-2022, the share of acres operated by large-scale farms has increased steadily from less than 50% to nearly 70%, accompanied with a continuous decline in the share of crop acres operated by medium-scale farms (100-499 and 500-1999 acres) (Figure 2).

Like many farming decisions, the choice of farm size is often driven by economic considerations. Larger-scale farms can gain higher profit margins due to economies of scale. Labor-saving innovations further expedited the increase of farm acres (MacDonald et al., 2013). Consequently, the majority of cropland became dominated by a small share of farms. As large-scale farms operate an increasing share of cropland, they also play a crucial role in enhancing the soil health and ecosystem functions of cropland in South Dakota.

Bar graph showing the distribution of South Dakota crop operations by number of farms and cropland acres For a detailed description of this figure and data set, please call SDSU Extension at 605-688-4792.
Figure 1. Distribution of South Dakota crop operations by number of farms and cropland acres (2022).
Area graph showing the composition of South Dakota crop acres by operation sizes in percentage. For a detailed description of this figure and data set, please call SDSU Extension at 605-688-4792.
Figure 2. Composition of South Dakota crop acres by operation sizes in percentage (1997-2022).

Number of Operations

Accompanied with more crop acres operated by large farms, the number of farm operations has declined considerably over the years. During 1997-2022, the total number of farm operations in SD has declined by nearly 30%, from 26,808 in 1997 to 19,302 in 2022 (Figure 3).

A closer examination of farm number changes by farm size indicated that the drop in farm numbers in recent years is mainly due to the decline in the number of medium-scale farms over time. During 1997-2022, the number of medium-scale farms in South Dakota has continuously declined (Figure 4).

Line graph showing the time trend of total number of crop operations and acres operated in South Dakota. For a detailed description of this figure and data set, please call SDSU Extension at 605-688-4792.
Figure 3. Time trend of total number of crop operations and acres operated in South Dakota (1997-2022).
Line graph showing the trend of crop operation numbers by operated crop acres in South Dakota. For a detailed description of this figure and data set, please call SDSU Extension at 605-688-4792.
Figure 4. Trend of crop operation numbers by operated crop acres in South Dakota (1997-2022).

Meanwhile, the proportion of small or hobby farms has been increasing over the years, from 11% to nearly 20% of the total farm numbers during 1997-2022 (Figure 5). One likely reason is that amid the rising land values (USDA, 2023), small farms are more affordable for new operators entering the farming businesses.

Bar graph showing the share of South Dakota farm operations by operated crop acres. For a detailed description of this figure and data set, please call SDSU Extension at 605-688-4792.
Figure 5. Share of South Dakota farm operations by operated crop acres (1997-2022).

In comparison to the rapidly increasing proportion of farmland operated by large-scale farms, the total crop areas operated by small farms remain low throughout the years. According to Figures 1 and 5, small-scale farms (<100 acres), which account for nearly 20% of South Dakota farms, operate only less than 1% of the cropland acres in 2022.

Cropland Acres

Cropland acres increased considerably during 2002-2017 period and the total cropland operated increased by 21%. Such an increase in cropland is at the expense of grassland loss, as the cropland to grassland conversion rate was at all-time high during that time, driven primarily by high crop commodity prices (Wang et al., 2017; Wimberly et al., 2017). From 2017 to 2022, total crop acres operated declined by nearly 7% (Figure 3). Cropland to grassland conversion has partly contributed to such a decline, as some farmers have converted their marginal lands, or land affected by saline and sodium conditions, to grassland.

References

  • MacDonald, James M., Korb, P., & Hoppe, Robert A. (2013). Farm Size and the Organization of U. S. Crop Farming. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, EIB-152. August.
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) (2022). 2022 Census of Agriculture.
  • USDA (2023). Land values 2023 summary.
  • Wang, T., Luri, M., Janssen, L., Hennessy, D. A., Feng, H., Wimberly, M. C., & Arora, G. (2017). Determinants of motives for land use decisions at the margins of the Corn Belt. Ecological economics, 134, 227-237.
  • Wang, T., Jin, H., Kreuter, U., and Teague, R. (2021). Expanding grass-based agriculture on marginal land in the US Great Plains: The role of management intensive grazing. Land Use Policy, 104, 105155.
  • Wimberly, M. C., Janssen, L. L., Hennessy, D. A., Luri, M., Chowdhury, N. M., & Feng, H. (2017). Cropland expansion and grassland loss in the eastern Dakotas: New insights from a farm-level survey. Land Use Policy, 63, 160–173.doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.01.026

Related Topics

Farm Business Management