Skip to main content

New Sensor Technology to Estimate Feed Intake in Lactating Dairy Cows

Updated January 30, 2020
Thumbnail

Tracey Erickson

SDSU Extension Dairy Field Specialist

Written collaboratively by Nathaly A. Carpinelli, Rodrigo Grazziotin, Johan Osorio and Fernanda Rosa.

Project Overview

The typical dairy farm worldwide has changed over the years, and the number of cows per dairy farm has increased, making it more difficult for producers to devote adequate time to each animal. The use of sensor technology to advance the field of precision livestock farming is becoming more predominant in modernized dairy farms. However, the full extent of the impact of these big data technologies in the future of large dairy herd operations remains to be fully explored. One of the usefulness of sensor technology is the current estimation of time spent eating and ruminating during 24-hour periods for lactating dairy cows. But the estimation of individual feed intake as lb of intake per day using accelerometer sensor data has not been explored.

Feed intake is an essential parameter to correlated health status during stress periods such as the transition period in dairy cows, and it is fundamental in calculating the overall milk efficiency in dairy cows (i.e., lb of milk/lb of intake). Therefore, the purpose of this experiment was to evaluate the feasibility of using accelerometer sensor technology to estimate individual feed intake of lactating dairy cows. We hypothesized that lactating dairy cows have specific movements that are highly correlated with feed intake and can be tracked using accelerometer sensor technology.

A dairy cow wearing a halter fitted with two accelerometers: one on the top of the cow's nose, and one on the side of its jaw. The nose accelerometer has three labeled arrows on it: The arrow pointing up is "Nose Y Acceleration" the one pointing up and to the right is "Nose Z Acceleration" the one pointing to the right is "Nose X Accelleration." For a complete description, call SDSU Extension at 605-688-6729.
Figure 1. Dairy cow fitted with a halter with two accelerometers over the nose and jaw area.

Methods

Dairy cattle wearing feeding muzzles while feeding at a feed bunk. A series of arrows on two of the cows labeled Y, Z, X represent feeding motions recorded by the muzzles, while two variables labeled T-0 and T-1 represent "lag" variables expressed by lowering their muzzle to the feed bunk table to eat. For a complete description, call SDSU Extension at 605-688-6729.
Figure 2. Lag variables were generated based on common behavior cows expressed by lowering their muzzle [from Time0 (T0) to Time1 (T1)] to the feed bunk table level to eat. Lag was calculated based on the difference between 2 consecutive time points.

To test this hypothesis, we conducted an experiment in Fall 2017 at the SDSU Dairy Research and Training Facility. Twenty-four Holstein cows in late lactation were evenly distributed into 2 groups, a calibration group, and a validation group, and were monitored for 10 days during this trial. All cows were fitted with 3 sensors (Hobo Pendant G Data Logger, Onset Computer Corp., Bourne, MA) that recorded 3-dimensional acceleration in 3 axes (i.e., x, y, and z) at 10 seconds intervals. One sensor was placed on the lateral side of the left hind leg and 2 attached directly to a halter over the nose and on the jaw area on the left side (Figure 1).

Cows were fed a common lactating cow diet (17.9% CP; 0.77 Mcal/ lb of DM) using an individual gate system, and individual feed intake was recorded daily by feeding cows once daily at 0630h and subtracting the manually weighed refusals the next day before the morning feeding. Throughout the study, feed samples were taken daily for determination of dry matter (DM) and nutrient composition.

Cows were video recorded continuously throughout the 10 days of experiment. In the validation group, the video recordings were examined after the trial and provided a continuous account of all time cows spent eating. And, such eating time was classified as each minute the cow remained in her respective feed door eating, standing idle, or ruminating.

A common and necessary movement cows make in order to reach the feed bunk is to lower their muzzle to the feed bunk table level before every eating bout, and we deemed this behavior important to account for feed intake. Therefore, we assessed this behavior through the accelerometer data by measuring the change in acceleration between 2 consecutive time points in jaw and nose accelerometers. Based on this, we generated “Lag” variables (e.g., difference in x-axis nose, where LagNose-X = Nose-X-Time1 – Nose-X-Time0) derived from jaw and nose accelerations (Figure 2).

Several equations were tested to estimate the individual feed intake of dairy cows, and such equations were derived from combining the multiple accelerometer data (e.g., Leg, Nose, Lag_Nose) from the calibration group with the corresponding eating bouts (obtained throughout video recordings).

Findings

A scatter plot graph analyzing feed intake and acceleration count recorded by the accelerometers. The "Y" axis is labeled "Feed Intake pounds as fed per day". The "X" axis is labeled "Acceleration count." Several dots on the chart represent observations, while three lines represent the regression plot, 95% confidence limits, and 95% prediction limits. For a complete description, call SDSU Extension at 605-688-6729.
Figure 3. Regression analysis between feed intake and acceleration count on LagNose-X.

In this study, 15 acceleration variables were tested, including 3 (i.e., x, y, and z) from each sensor (i.e., nose, jaw, and leg) and 6 new Lag variables based on the change in acceleration in the nose and jaw sensors as explained above. These variables and their combinations were assessed to develop and test candidate models that can predict feed intake. A total of 32,767 potential combinations were evaluated across all 15 acceleration variables, and only 921 acceleration combinations were deemed relevant for further evaluation because each contained at least 80% of all potential data.

Interestingly, we observed that Lag variables that are related to change in acceleration accounted for the highest variations in feed intake. For instance, LagNose-X accounted for 44% of the variation in feed intake (Figure 3). This means that the simple and common movement cows make of lowering their muzzle to the feed bunk table level can be capture via accelerometers and is highly correlated with feed intake; thus, demonstrating the great potential of accelerometers to estimate feed intake.

A scatter plot graph comparing "actual intake" and "intake derived from acceleration." The "Y" axis is labeled "Intake, kilograms of dry feed per day." The "X" axis is labled "Days 1 through 10." Yellow plots represent dry matter derived from acceleration. Red plots represent actual dry matter intake. For a complete description, call SDSU Extension at 605-688-6729.
Figure 4. Comparison over time between actual intake (DMI actual) and intake derived from the acceleration combination Jaw-Z + Nose-Y + LagNose-Z (DMI accel).

Another important aspect of our findings was that among the candidate models, we observed a significant degree of accuracy. For instance, the acceleration combination Jaw-Z + Nose-Y + LagNose-Z was able to return a highly similar feed intake (i.e., DMIaccel) to the actually measured feed intake (i.e., DMIactual). As observed in Figure 4, DMIaccel closely followed changes in feed intake during the 10 days of the trial. We must emphasize the fact that such an estimate of feed intake was done based only on acceleration, and no other variable (e.g., body weight or days in milk) was used.

Conclusion

From a management perspective, individual feed intake could be a valuable tool for decision-making at the commercial farm level. Unfortunately, this is not currently available as lb of feed intake per day; rather, commercially available sensor systems register % time of feeding behavior. On the research side, individual feed intake has always been fundamental to determine the impact of a nutritional or physiological effect. The multiple accelerometer approach and derived acceleration models proposed here suggest that cows have specific movements highly correlated with intake.

Predicting intake in dairy cows is a challenging endeavor, and this was reflected in the amount of noise observed in this study based on accelerations alone. However, we envision that accurate accelerometer-based algorithms can estimate intake will allow dairy farmers to not only monitor abnormal eating behavior in dairy cows but also determine milk efficiency.

Related Topics

Dairy Cattle