Skip to main content

Organic Sweet Corn Production in Clover Living Mulch Systems: 2-Year Research Summary

Updated January 29, 2026
Professional headshot of Kristine Lang

Kristine Lang

Assistant Professor & SDSU Extension Consumer Horticulture Specialist

Written by Kristina Harms, SDSU M.S. Graduate Research Assistant, under the direction and review of Thandiwe Nleya and Kristine Lang.

Background

Rows of sweet corn growing among clover mulch in a research plot.
(Photo: Kristina Harms, SDSU)

Adjusting to varying weather across multiple seasons is a challenge farmers have been facing for generations. The historical grassland prairies of South Dakota, while favorable for growing many vegetable crops, are known for seasonality and unpredictable springs. Sweet corn is a popular warm season specialty crop that is a staple across many places in the United States, including South Dakota. As a warm season crop, sweet corn prefers warm soil temperatures and well drained conditions to sprout. This feature of warm season grasses can take advantage of the mid-summer heat in our state but can be sensitive to unpredictable wet or very cold springs.

Methods Used

Research in 2024 and 2025 in a USDA certified organic field at the SDSU Southeast Research Farm explored growing sweet corn in three types of clover grown as a living mulch. Living mulch systems are a cover crop that is grown alongside the chosen main (cash) crop. Chosen clover cultivars for this study included ‘Domino’ White Clover (Trifolium repens), Aberlasting’ White x Kura Clover (T. repens x ambiguum), and ‘Domino’ Red Clover (T. pratense). The clover plots were established two years prior to planting the sweet corn (Barnes et al., 2023; Harms et al., 2024). A bare ground treatment with no cover crop was used as a control. All systems were strip-tilled to allow for direct seeding of sweet corn seeds. Sweet corn was planted in mid-May both years of the study and harvested at the beginning of August. Sweet corn yield was compared to the USDA Marketable standards for husk off sweet corn grading standards (USDA: 7 CFR Section 51.835).

Findings

Weather Impacts

Strong differences in sweet corn growth occurred between 2024 and 2025, influenced by very different weather patterns between the years. In 2024, spring had heavy rainfall, but it took place after sweet corn planting and was a singular occurrence (Figure 1-A). During the 2025 growing season, spring had a late snap of cold after sweet corn planting which delayed sweet corn emergence (Figure 1-B).

Bar graph showing 2024 mesonet data for precipitation and bare-ground soil temperature. For a detailed description, please call SDSU Extension at 605-688-4792.
Figure 1-A. Precipitation and bare ground soil temperature at four-inch depth, as sourced from the South Dakota Mesonet data for planting date of May 13, 2024, at Beresford Southeast Research Station. Soil temperature in Bare Ground was 76-degrees, which is warm enough for non-treated, organic sweet corn to be planted.
Bar graph showing 2025 mesonet data for precipitation and bare-ground soil temperature. For a detailed description, please call SDSU Extension at 605-688-4792.
Figure 1-B. Precipitation and bare ground soil temperature at four-inch depth, as sourced from the South Dakota Mesonet data for planting date of May 14, 2025, at Beresford Southeast Research Station. Soil temperature dropped to below ideal sweet corn planting temperature of 65-degrees Fahrenheit from May 15 until May 31, 2025.

Clover Varieties 

All clover varieties had accelerated growth during the cold snap of 2025, putting sweet corn at a disadvantage and affecting stalk height over the entire season (Figure 2-A and 2-B). Red clover specifically affected sweet corn growth and yield, producing the least number of marketable ears in both seasons (Figure 3-A and 3-B). Red clover also produced the most weed biomass, due to heavy competition with weed pressure. After mowing events, red clover was not re-established and instead was outcompeted by the weeds. White clover and kura clover thrived with high water quantities in 2024 and 2025, establishing through rhizomes and stolons, and out-competing weed pressure.

Rows of sweet corn growing in a research plot under various treatments.
Figure 2-A. Sweet corn on Jul 9, 2024. Sweet corn shown growing in white clover, red clover, and bare ground - left to right. Heights of the sweet corn in the clover treatments are similar to the bare ground. In 2024, although the clover treatments appeared to be a week behind development of the bare ground, the clover end of season stalk heights were within 10 centimeters of each other. The sweet corn stalk height was less of an indicator in the struggles of the sweet corn growth, than the differences in growth stages between the bare ground and clover plots. (Photo: Kristina Harms, SDSU)
Several rows of sweet corn growing in a research plot under various treatments.
Figure 2-B. Sweet corn on 8 Jul 2025. Sweet corn shown growing in kura clover, red clover, and bare ground – front to back. Heights of sweet corn in the clover treatments are severely below the bare ground control. The sweet corn within the clover treatments did not emerge and develop as quickly as the bare ground. The stalk heights were much diminished for the clover treatments in the 2025 growing season. Both the growth stages and the stalk heights were two weeks behind in the clover treatments as compared to the bare ground. (Photo: Kristina Harms, SDSU)

Tassel profile of sweet corn grown in research plot in 2025.
Figure 3-A. 2025 tassel height of sweet corn grown in red clover. The sweet corn was highly stunted, due to lack of nutrients. (Photo: Kristina Harms, SDSU)
Tassel profile of sweet corn grown in research plot in 2024.
Figure 3-B. 2024 tassel height of sweet corn grown in red clover. The sweet corn struggled with nutrients and growing degree days but still produced height in growth during the 2024 season. (Photo: Kristina Harms, SDSU)

Growth and Yield

Acclimating to varying seasons is a consistent challenge for farmers, and knowledge of inconsistent yield output based on our results is a cautionary tale for adoption of living mulch systems for organic sweet corn production. Clover living mulch systems were shown to increase production challenges impacted by seasonality including, colder temperatures, inconsistent rainfall, and severe storm damage. These factors highly impacted both the growth and yield of sweet corn (Figure 4-A, 4-B, and 4-C).

The yield of the sweet corn produced the highest quality under bare ground over both years, although in 2024 the total marketable yield under all USDA categories was within 10% of each other. This was not reflected in 2025, when clover varieties did produce much smaller marketable yields compared to the bare ground control.

Three ears of sweet corn on a tray with a metal ruler for scale.
Figure 4-A. Sweet corn grading differences in 2024 bare ground treatment. Top to bottom is: Unmarketable, US Number 1, and US Fancy. Grading for husk off was in alignment with USDA marketable standards for sweet corn. Bare ground produced high percentage of US Fancy in 2024, with straight development, good tip fill, and proper kernel maturity. (Photo: Kristina Harms, SDSU)
Two ears of sweet corn on a tray with a metal ruler for scale.
Figure 4-B. Sweet corn grading differences in 2024, under the red clover treatment. Sweet corn on the top would be considered US Number 1, and the ear on the bottom is US Number 2. Sweet corn grown in 2024 under red clover treatment, were lower quality but still considered marketable. Much of the lower standards came from lack of tip fill, and not prime kernel development (not straight rows). (Photo: Kristina Harms, SDSU)
Five ears of sweet corn of varying quality arranged on a cutting board.
Figure 4-C. Sweet corn grading differences in 2025 under the kura clover treatment, specifically no-till treatment. Much of the sweet corn in 2025 under the clover living mulch, did not palate to US Fancy category. The ear on the left was the highest quality produced in kura clover no-till, which would be a US Number 1 ear, due to lack of proper ear development. The other demonstrated ears would not be considered marketable, due to lack of pollination, tip fill, and ear maturity. (Photo: Kristina Harms, SDSU)

Weed Control

Weed control was one benefit of the living mulch systems: white clover and kura clover promoted weed suppression especially late season, while red clover did not. Red clover would be a beneficial cover crop but does not grow well to diminish weeds after mowing occurrences in living mulch systems. Considerations before implementing living mulch systems would be establishing a clear planting bed and using adequate early season fertilizer. 

Conclusion

Usage of clover living mulch systems for sweet corn results in expectations of lower marketable crops, and competition between the clover and cash crop. Farmers who want to incorporate living mulches for soil health and weed management benefits will need to be willing to acclimate to varying weather over seasons and be able to accept a loss of sweet corn yield or explore using this system for crops that are less sensitive than sweet corn.

Acknowledgements
Special thanks to the USDA Specialty Crop Block Grant Program administered by the South Dakota Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources for funding the establishment of these plots. The ongoing work is funded by the USDA NIFA Organic Transitions Program under grant agreement number 2022-51106-37925. This project would not be possible without these additional grant team members: Sutie Xu, Peter Sexton, Tong Wang, Navreet Mahal, Rhoda Burrows, Alexis Barnes, Nitish Joshi, Joslyn Fousert, and Connor Ruen. A large thank you to the Master Gardeners Kara Weinandt, Sandi King, and Donna Breed. Thanks to the SDSU Undergraduate Research Assistants, Gabrielle Thooft, Karissa Bickett, and Chloe Dondlinger. Thank you to Denver Nordmann, Joslyn Fousert, Bradley Rops, Peter Sexton and all the staff at the SDSU Southeast Research farm for immense help and continued support.

References and Suggested Resources